ahuangdds2@gmail.com wrote:
> There seems to be one strong negative opinion in here regarding
> Periolase LANAP treatment.
I have no strong negative opinions of lasers and perio. I used my
water lase on a patient with 6 mm pockets between the UL canine and
1st remolar a year ago and yesterday those same pockets measured 2 mm.
So *cautious* *selective* use of new technology is something I support.
Jumping on a bandwagon and zapping everything greater than 3 mm to
create a huge new profit center is something that I would not support.
JMO,
D