In article
<d2d5aa90-faca-4152-b375-0113ed7f1d7b@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
jerm <blownout@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 10:16 am, The Webby <tmjiatroepide...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Hello everyone. As you all know, there are basically two active threads
> > concerning NTI related issues.
> >
> > It seems to me that the discussion needs more direction; possibly with a
> > few subject lines to focus on various issues.
> >
> > What are your thoughts on developing a more useful *series of threads*;
> > focusing on the separate concerns as expressed in "NTI failure
> > continued" and "NTI continued", and perhaps one that brings them all
> > together in summary?
> >
> > Webby
>
> I believe the summary would be something like it didnt work for me. 43
> days into NTI,and
> im no better during the day. maybe it helps me sleep better, but
> beyond that im in the same condition.
Okay... for example, one concern with two counterpoints.
Subject: Using an NTI: Reasonable and unreasonable expectations
1. The value of reasonable expectations
2. The risks of unreasonable expectations
jerm
jerm
